This is a paid article which your subscription is allowing you to read.

Qatar is an intriguing country. A small peninsula nation jutting off from the larger Arabian Peninsula and into the Arabian Gulf. Like many other Arab countries, Qatar hosts an abundance of natural resource wealth, and according to the International Monetary Fund Qataris are the 15th richest people in the world on a per capita basis. In contrast to its neighbours, Qatar does not predominantly use its cash pipeline for exotic tourism projects, for decades it has rather used its own nationally owned investment pot to discreetly build a network of immense political and social influence within the Middle Eastern and Western domain.

Although other Arab countries have utilised their own wealth funds to build rapport with the West, the sheer scale of Qatar’s efforts remain unmatched, with intensive diplomatic efforts granting a unique level of access to the major Western defence pact the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Qatar is a “Major Non-Western NATO ally”, a position that only 18 non-NATO countries hold. The status it holds within this pact remains largely questionable – given Qatar’s previous ties to, for example, the Islamic State (ISIS) which committed various acts of terrorism in various NATO countries since 2014.

Qatar has a diverse array of natural resources, natural gas representing their primary source of income, reflecting 13% of the global total of natural gas reserves. Qatar also possesses a significant crude oil reserve representing about 1.4% of the global total. It also has a relatively small population, with about 360 000 citizens and a migrant labour force of about 2.8 million. Its GDP per capita is $72 760, and it has a generous social welfare system including paid tuition for Qatari citizens for any university in the world as well as a free luxuriously furnished villa for every married couple.

Despite this, at its core, Qatar is an Arab, tribal, un-Democratic country governed by an Islamic absolute monarchy, typical for the Gulf region. But it differs slightly from the broader Arab world in terms of governance; whereby Islamic doctrine takes up a greater space in legislation and policy making.

This is evident through their own attempts to alter Muslim opinion via direct support for religious and media institutions globally, key to becoming a leader in the Muslim world.

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB), a highly controversial, multinational institution central to the geopolitical Islamic world, has been a major receiver of Qatari funding, becoming essentially an extension of their own foreign policy.

The MB was founded in 1913 in Egypt and is important player across most of the Arab world. The MB’s notoriety largely stems from its ideological inspiration for Islamist Terrorist organisations such as Al-Qaeda and Hamas (Qatar is also known to have sheltered leaders of Hamas). The MB’s ideological aims are clear through its motto: “Allah is our objective; the Koran is our constitution; the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” It is estimated that its own reach spans no less than 92 countries with members also belonging to Mosque leadership throughout much of the West and other countries where Muslims are a minority.

Mosques and Islamic Learning centres around the world have witnessed repeated incidents of extreme Islamist preaching, promoting Jihadism. Directly linking it to the rise of Isis recruitment throughout that of Western Europe since 2014 where many of such terrorists had passed through such networks.

Beyond direct organisational involvement, there has been an active push for ideological influence over Muslim political opinion through Qatar’s own well-established Arabic-language media outlets such as Al Jazeera (AJ) - the world’s largest Arabic news organisation.

While Al Jazeera’s English Channel is their most familiar branch to its Western audience, often for its pro-Arab framing of current geopolitical affairs, its Arabic branch’s content goes largely unheard of in the Western world.

With there being between 400-450 million Arabic Speakers worldwide, AJ is the most watched pan-Arabic news channel. These viewers are often subject to a curated portfolio of politically and ideologically aligned presenters, journalists and producers – each covering their own area of expertise relevant to the average Arab viewer.

Of these issues covered by AJ Arabic, its vitriolic portrayal of the West remains central to the outlet’s modus operandi.

This is observed by its ongoing release of content that exploits widespread distrust of the West. The content itself revolves around a central theme of revisionist history through its reframing of historical and current events through an Islamist lens, simplifying a complex history of the region and simplifying it to a narrative of Western hegemony and subjugation of Arabs.

By the retelling of events to its viewers, these disinformation campaigns ultimately seek to put pressure on other Arab countries to be politically aligned with Qatar’s own flavour of international and domestic politics.

When observing Qatar’s actions with regards to the Muslim world and its incubation of Islamic terrorism, it raises the question on how Qatar sustains a uniquely positive image amongst the top officials throughout much of the West.

The answer remains to be what could be described as an intricate shopping list of what are the most elite political advisors and experts, granting them an incredibly privileged position as mediator in international conflicts such as the ongoing Iran War and 2023 Israel-Hamas War – where their own promotion of anti-Western ideals was largely overlooked.

Since Qatar does not possess their own “organic” homegrown academic institutions and expertise necessary for high-stakes diplomacy (unlike their Western peers), they prioritise the purchasing of those minds instead, in the form of donations to top Western Academia, highly regarded think tanks, and recruitment of various experts to provide advice.

This notion is represented by data showcasing how much funding of top international universities have been linked to Qatar.

Qatar alone remains the number one donor of American universities today, since 2001 its funding has risen to more than $6.5 billion in reported funds, more than any other country since 2001.

By doing so they achieve two separate and equally necessary objectives.

Firstly, they optimise the efficiency of their own political infrastructure and diplomatic leverage on the international stage. Through the advice provided by top experts, Qatar’s own ambassadors, diplomats, and political strategists receive tailored training in relationship building and negotiation specific to the Middle East and the West.

Secondly, they build a rapport with the very minds that do work for these Western governments as well – securing positive representation beyond the scope of what would otherwise be limited to official foreign diplomacy. These, often individuals, act as quasi-lobbyists operating as advocates for Qatari-aligned policy and strategy outside of an official framework.

These efforts have been largely successful, prominent significant officials in the United States such as current Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel, who had provided security and counter-terrorism expertise to Qatar leading up to the Qatari 2022 World Cup, which had not been disclosed in his Senate confirmation hearings.

Among other officials who performed consulting for Qatar was the fired former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had been hired prior to 2025 by Qatar, acted to “provide government relations strategic advice and advocacy with respect to enhancing US-Qatar bilateral relations”.

This was ultimately proven by the recent correlation between Qatari interests and White House decision-making, granting Qatar’s stake as key mediators between the Israel and Hamas conflict up until 2025 and the US/Iran conflict in 2026.

Beyond the scope of political advocacy, Qatar has pursued network building amongst journalists through direct financial contracts and sponsoring of academic learning programs, creating an assembly line of politically aligned promoters who are then platformed on prominent news outlets such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian and CNN.

This strategy is used in conjunction with Qatar’s own loyal media network they have built through the same procedure of intellectual acquisition, essentially creating a highly coordinated and loosely linked information network.

This is seen more clearly when analysing the coverage of current and historical political issues. Notably the lead up to the current Iran war – whereby a massive information campaign had been set to overblow the potential risks and outcomes of such a conflict such as suggesting the high possibility of World War Three or a major global recession.

This media campaign took place in conjunction with Qatar’s own attempts to convince the US not to engage in the Iranian conflict and instead engage diplomatically with Iran through Qatar itself – protecting its own economic interests but also against the potential loss of a secret ally like Iran.

Though Qatar’s own PR presents itself as a mediator in the conflict, it has actively shown that it pursues more than just tolerating the presence of its neighbour, Iran. Iran is also an ideological promoter of Islamic ideals like Qatar but has been directly sponsored extensive terrorism campaigns in the Middle East and West through its proxies such as Hezbollah, unlike Qatar. Iran also acts as a counter influence to the West in the Middle East, and as an important ally of Russia and China, the latter is a major buyer of Qatari natural gas and signed a $60-billion contract with Qatar in 2023.

A clear pattern emerges when Qatar actively aims to build relations between itself and the West, it actively promotes conflicting ideals amongst Muslim and non-Muslims around the world. It is all part of a broader strategy to grow Qatar’s global influence.

Alfred Thayer Mahan was a United States Navy officer and historian in the 19th and 20th centuries and considered by some to be one of the most important American strategists.