This is a paid article which your subscription is allowing you to read.

The IEC’s latest political funding report, covering donations received between January and March 2026, shows total declared party donations of R97 227 735.55. Once late submissions and contributions below the reporting threshold are included, the grand total for the quarter rises to R97 883 030.15.

The Democratic Alliance was the biggest declared recipient, reporting R57 317 303.55 for the quarter. Rise Mzansi followed, with R30 000 000. The African National Congress was third, with R10 019 100. ActionSA declared R9 910 432, while the Inkatha Freedom Party declared R186 726.

The IEC report also records contributions to the Multi-Party Democracy Fund, a separate private funding pool administered by the IEC and distributed to represented parties. Standard Bank contributed R1 500 000 and Vodacom contributed R3 000 000, taking the fund’s quarterly total to R4 500 000.

Those are the numbers that attract attention. They show which donors are backing which parties. They produce the headlines. But they do not show the main way political parties are funded in South Africa.

The larger story is that taxpayers fund political parties on a far bigger scale than private donors do.

There are several streams of political party funding in South Africa. Parties receive declared private donations. They can benefit from the Multi-Party Democracy Fund, which is also private money. They may also receive donations below the disclosure threshold, meaning the public does not see the full private funding picture. However, it stretches the limits of credulity to think that some political parties, like the Economic Freedom Fighters, or the uMkhonto weSizwe Party, which have seldomly declared any funding above the threshold, only receive donations below that threshold. And then there is the biggest income stream of all: public money.

The first major taxpayer-funded stream is the Political Representatives Fund, previously known as the Represented Political Parties Fund. This is administered by the IEC and pays money to political parties represented in the National Assembly and provincial legislatures. The formula used to determine the amount of funding disbursed to parties is split between equal and proportional allocations, meaning parties receive money partly because they hold seats and partly according to how many seats they hold.

In the IEC’s latest annual report, for 2024/25, the Political Representatives Fund disbursed R566 879 237 to compliant represented political parties.

The second major stream is Parliament itself. Parliament’s own budget includes a transfer called political party allowances. This money is intended to support parties represented in Parliament, for leadership, administrative, and constituency support. Parliament’s 2025/26 annual performance plan budgets R627 815 000 for political party allowances in 2025/26, rising to R656 206 000 in 2026/27 and R687 704 000 in 2027/28.

That means political parties are not merely receiving public money from the IEC. They also receive public money through Parliament’s budget.

The third stream is the provincial legislatures. Each provincial legislature has its own support arrangements for parties represented in that province. These often appear in budgets and annual reports as political party funding, constituency allowances, caucus allowances, research allowances, or secretarial support.

The Gauteng Provincial Legislature’s 2024/25 annual report records R184 468 097 paid to political parties under political party funding and constituency allowances.

Even using only the national Political Representatives Fund, Parliament’s political party allowances, and Gauteng’s provincial party funding, the taxpayer bill already reaches at least R1.379 billion. That excludes the other eight provincial legislatures. It excludes municipal-level caucus, whip, administrative, or constituency support. It excludes the cost of ordinary salaries, offices, travel, and benefits attached to elected office.

That is the point voters are seldom shown. The public debate tends to focus on private donors, but the taxpayer is the biggest political donor in South Africa.

Parties argue that public funding is necessary for democracy because it reduces reliance on wealthy donors and helps smaller parties compete. But the same parties that benefit from these allocations also sit in the institutions that approve the budgets. Parliament’s own plans show political party allowances rising over the medium term.

The result is a political funding system with four layers. Declared private donations are visible. The Multi-Party Democracy Fund is privately funded but disbursed by the IEC. Below-threshold donations remain unseen by the public. Taxpayer funding, meanwhile, flows through the IEC, Parliament, and provincial legislatures.

The latest IEC declaration report therefore raises a bigger question than which donor gave what to whom. It shows that private money is only the visible tip of the political finance system. The larger pool of money comes from the public, and it keeps growing through the budgets political parties help approve for themselves.